Subjects of evidence in the judicial process: comparative analysis and philosophical

dc.contributor.authorShaptala, N.K.
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-19T04:15:42Z
dc.date.available2018-10-19T04:15:42Z
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.description.abstractThe article is devoted to the study of evidence and proof in the constitutional litigation. The author conducts a comparative study of foreign and domestic legislation, which regulates the procedure for the adoption, evaluation and use of evidence in legal proceedings of various types of procedural law and, based on its results, offers its original approach to understanding the philosophical and legal meaning of the problem under study.ru_RU
dc.identifier.issn2307-521Х
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kazguu.kz/handle/123456789/543
dc.language.isoenru_RU
dc.publisherПраво и государствоru_RU
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectproofru_RU
dc.subjectevidenceru_RU
dc.subjectlegislationru_RU
dc.subjectconstitutionalityru_RU
dc.subjectsubject of proofru_RU
dc.subjectsubject of evidenceru_RU
dc.subjectlitigationru_RU
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::LAW/JURISPRUDENCEru_RU
dc.titleSubjects of evidence in the judicial process: comparative analysis and philosophicalru_RU
dc.typeСтатья (Article)ru_RU

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
6. Шаптала Н.К. 71-80.pdf
Size:
521.55 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections